tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post2048275204236406442..comments2023-11-05T02:53:51.987-05:00Comments on Cosa Nostra News: Renee's Mob Candy Line: 'Everything a Mob Princess Would Wear'Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-73750520936654961872013-12-17T01:36:59.958-05:002013-12-17T01:36:59.958-05:00To anonOct18: Again trademarks are not my point. S...To anonOct18: Again trademarks are not my point. She appropriated an existing brand and made a bullshit story about how she created it. Look at her on the cover! She thinks her fans are idiots. ADDITIONAL NOTE: They are saying Mob Candy plenty! I hope every time ya all hear it you think of Frank DiMatteo and his magazine ...Ed Scarpohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02178654099167979284noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-69244728464882010702013-12-09T12:50:02.886-05:002013-12-09T12:50:02.886-05:00It seems to me that the words MOB CANDY were used ...It seems to me that the words MOB CANDY were used minimally on the show n replaced with MY BRAND as a description for her line..that will be the closest she'll come to acknowledging the thievery of Your Family's title to the magazine. The rerun of the segment where she meets with the designers for her shoe line? FUHGEDABOUDIT! The words INTERCHANGEABLE HEELS were totally edited out of her mouth..LOL..it'll all catch up with her n Frank will have his vindication..n You n Chris will have a field day with the Blogs..I'm waiting for it along with MANY OTHERS..Happy Holidays ~ Susan TestaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-76561157275141633582013-12-07T05:24:18.780-05:002013-12-07T05:24:18.780-05:00Your father should of trade marked the magazine ...Your father should of trade marked the magazine / I ain't nothing different from the street she stool from you. Those graziano sisters steal ideas from people They are dirty whores / there father is a punk too / he never even killed no one : like frank Lino said when I was with him " this TG " made him self out to be a real big shot in staten island mean while he was parked 10 blocks away as a crash car / tony graziano is a Mutt Fuck these low life's Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-869278629325293882013-12-05T14:48:18.103-05:002013-12-05T14:48:18.103-05:00This is not entertainment...to me at least. God bl...This is not entertainment...to me at least. God bless her but, she should leave the Family out of it. It is somewhat of a betrayal. I understand she has a lot invested ( plastic surgery, contracts, etc ). The usage of expletives and show business doesn't do any good....it only brings to light and diminishes what has been worked for a hundred years. She and the others should find another profession....fast.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-81618038144065260022013-12-02T07:08:32.681-05:002013-12-02T07:08:32.681-05:00Those Graziano's are thieves.Those Graziano's are thieves.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-76484953400872754092013-10-18T08:24:43.031-04:002013-10-18T08:24:43.031-04:00I am not a Trademark attorney, but I would like to...I am not a Trademark attorney, but I would like to know why Mr. Dimatteo has been so quiet regarding Ms. Graziano and the fact that she has stolen the name Mobcandy and is currently promoting her clothing line, along with shoes, jewelry and beauty products. It was mentioned, in this site I believe, the reason Mr. Dimatteo has done nothing about it is because he is old school, which makes absolutely no sense at all. Mr. Dimatteo may not have rights to sue Ms Graziano at all, since he neither Trademarked or had Copyywritten the name. Even though Ms. Graziano's Trademark application is a total mess, it appears she may have more rights to proceed with her current line of products than Mr. Dimatteo. If this Heath Wasserman is granted approval for his Trademark, I would be concerned if I were Ms. Graziano and Mr. Dimatteo.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-68756067033342920232013-09-29T16:38:00.188-04:002013-09-29T16:38:00.188-04:00I'm surprised also.I'm surprised also.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-78440362314597680572013-09-21T15:30:34.658-04:002013-09-21T15:30:34.658-04:00It surprises me Attorney Chernin has not already c...It surprises me Attorney Chernin has not already contacted Ms. Graziano.Anonynousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-43897310422491624322013-09-16T22:36:24.126-04:002013-09-16T22:36:24.126-04:00NO, she won't be able to because she keeps fil...NO, she won't be able to because she keeps filing for it & the USPTO gives you 5 opportunities to do an extension. Plus on her site she's selling shoes. according to the USPTO she listed that she's selling jewelry so she's committing fraud. the mark is owned by someone in Chicago, it's called MOBCANDY, all one word. MOBCANDY doesn't belong to her, it belongs to the person in the MidWest. her mark will be rejected & the lawyer will just keep taking her money. imagine that? thieves paying lawyers when they lose? what a novel concept huh? this is the person who owns the mark; STANDARD CHARACTER MARK YES<br />LITERAL MARK ELEMENT MOBCANDY<br />MARK DRAWING CODE 4-STANDARD CHARACTER MARK<br />COLOR DRAWING FLAG NO<br /><br />CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION<br /><br />PARTY TYPE 10-ORIGINAL APPLICANT<br />NAME WASSERMAN, HEATH NORMAN<br />ADDRESS 711 CREEKSIDE CIRCLE<br />GURNEE, IL 60031<br />ENTITY 01-INDIVIDUAL<br />CITIZENSHIP United States of America<br />DBA/AKA DBA MOBCANDY<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-76980921134749796762013-09-12T09:35:31.657-04:002013-09-12T09:35:31.657-04:00I can't believe she's actually gone full s...I can't believe she's actually gone full steam ahead with this! Once a thief, always a thief... Susan Testa Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-88024156354496829572013-08-21T18:28:52.512-04:002013-08-21T18:28:52.512-04:00Yeah RG is using the name MOB CANDY ® on her websi...Yeah RG is using the name MOB CANDY ® on her website - I hope the idiot reads this because guess what......read the information below. her application had been denied so the rightful owner of the mark will now have the legal right to sue her. she's got some lawyer who is more than happy to take her $$. This information is directly from the USPTO website....i didn't pull it out of my azzz :) this is funny though. ah nothing like seeing people trying to get over....<br /><br /><br />You may only use the federal registration symbol "®" after the USPTO actually registers a mark, not while an application is pending. And it may only be used on or in connection with the goods/services listed in the federal trademark registration and while the registration is still alive (you may not continue to use it if you don’t maintain the registration or it expires). Although there are no specific requirements on where the symbol should be placed relative to the mark, most businesses use the symbol in the upper right corner of the mark. Note: Because several foreign countries use “®” to indicate that a mark is registered in that country, use of the symbol by the holder of a foreign registration may be proper.<br /> <br />Additional information concerning trademarks is available at www.uspto.gov. <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-47214762279756565612013-08-21T17:39:50.758-04:002013-08-21T17:39:50.758-04:00Yeah RG is using the name MOB CANDY ® on her websi...Yeah RG is using the name MOB CANDY ® on her website - I hope the idiot reads this because guess what......read the information below. her application had been denied so the rightful owner of the mark will now have the legal right to sue her. she's got some lawyer who is more than happy to take her $$. This information is directly from the USPTO website....i didn't pull it out of my azzz :) this is funny though. ah nothing like seeing people trying to get over....<br /><br /><br />You may only use the federal registration symbol "®" after the USPTO actually registers a mark, not while an application is pending. And it may only be used on or in connection with the goods/services listed in the federal trademark registration and while the registration is still alive (you may not continue to use it if you don’t maintain the registration or it expires). Although there are no specific requirements on where the symbol should be placed relative to the mark, most businesses use the symbol in the upper right corner of the mark. Note: Because several foreign countries use “®” to indicate that a mark is registered in that country, use of the symbol by the holder of a foreign registration may be proper.<br /> <br />Additional information concerning trademarks is available at www.uspto.gov. <br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-44370486159427903542013-08-21T10:35:41.562-04:002013-08-21T10:35:41.562-04:00UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
...UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)<br />RG's trademark was suspended. See the following information<br /><br />OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION<br /> <br />U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 85820598<br /> <br />MARK: MOB CANDY<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />*85820598*<br />CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:<br /> GARY ADELMAN<br /> DAVIS SHAPIRO & LEWIT LLP<br /> 689 5TH AVE FL 5<br /> NEW YORK, NY 10022-3154<br /> <br /> <br />GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION:<br />http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/index.jsp<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />APPLICANT: Lunatickle Enterprises, Inc<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: <br /> N/A<br />CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: <br /> garya@davisshapiro.com<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />SUSPENSION NOTICE: NO RESPONSE NEEDED<br /> <br />ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 4/23/2013<br /> <br /> <br />The trademark examining attorney is suspending action on the application for the reason(s) stated below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq. <br /> <br />The USPTO will periodically conduct a status check of the application to determine whether suspension remains appropriate, and the trademark examining attorney will issue as needed an inquiry letter to applicant regarding the status of the matter on which suspension is based. TMEP §§716.04, 716.05. Applicant will be notified when suspension is no longer appropriate. See TMEP §716.04.<br /> <br />No response to this notice is necessary; however, if applicant wants to respond, applicant should use the “Response to Suspension Inquiry or Letter of Suspension” form online at http://teasroa.uspto.gov/rsi/rsi.<br /> Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-19623837530672584952013-08-21T10:28:07.536-04:002013-08-21T10:28:07.536-04:00Ok the name RG is trying to use will not be allowe...Ok the name RG is trying to use will not be allowed once this is finalized. Some lawyer is taking her $$ to try & file this name. Once it's published & there's no OPPOSITION then the person who filed this TM will have the legal right to use it solely for the purpose(s) stated; therefore meaning anyone who uses this name will no longer be able to do so my LAW. <br /><br />From: TMOfficialNotices@USPTO.GOV<br />Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 00:05 AM<br />To: cherninm@hotmail.com<br />Cc: mobcandyinc@gmail.com<br />Subject: Trademark Serial Number 85681509: Official USPTO Notice of Allowance<br /><br /><br />NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE (NOA) <br /><br />ISSUE DATE: Jul 30, 2013<br /><br />Serial Number: 85681509<br />Mark: MOBCANDY(STANDARD CHARACTER MARK) <br />Docket/Reference Number: <br /><br />No opposition was filed for this published application. The issue date of this NOA establishes the due date for the filing of a Statement of Use (SOU) or a Request for Extension of Time to file a Statement of Use (Extension Request). WARNING: An SOU that meets all legal requirements must be filed before a registration certificate can issue. Please read below for important information regarding the applicant's pending six (6) month deadline.<br /><br />SIX (6)-MONTH DEADLINE: Applicant has six (6) MONTHS from the NOA issue date to file either:<br /> - An SOU, if the applicant is using the mark in commerce (required even if the applicant was using the mark at the time of filing the application, if use basis was not specified originally); OR<br /> - An Extension Request, if the applicant is not yet using the mark in commerce. If an Extension Request is filed, a new request must be filed every six (6) months until the SOU is filed. The applicant may file a total of five (5) extension requests. WARNING: An SOU may not be filed more than thirty-six (36) months from when the NOA issued. The deadline for filing is always calculated from the issue date of the NOA.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-8319337688653845772013-08-20T10:13:40.031-04:002013-08-20T10:13:40.031-04:00Ed, just go to the USPTO and do a trademark searc...Ed, just go to the USPTO and do a trademark search. Type in MobCandy. It's already registered. The one that RG submitted was rejected. Her layer will continue to take her $$ & it ain't cheap if your paying a lawyer. Once the trademark name gets published in the USPTO GAZETTE magazine with no opposition the person/company then has to just submit material i.e., advertising, consumer based goods or anything showing that name they've selected detailing a product that has been used in commerce. it could be something as simple as postcard displaying the name. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-46779477417032975272013-08-20T08:03:14.719-04:002013-08-20T08:03:14.719-04:00Please contact me - I'd like to know what this...Please contact me - I'd like to know what this means - in English.<br />Evlieb83@verizon.net<br />Maybe an update is warranted? Ed Scarpohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02178654099167979284noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-26147296430292081422013-08-17T15:17:15.603-04:002013-08-17T15:17:15.603-04:00Renee will have to pay back any $$ she made using ...Renee will have to pay back any $$ she made using the pseudonym MobCandy. Once it's published in the The Gazette Magazine via the UPSTO & the NOU (Notice of Use) is approved via the USPTO attorney anyone who uses the trademark name will be brought up on INFRINGEMENT charges. Maybe she share a jail a cell with one of her buddies?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-50831615902238083392013-08-17T15:14:20.127-04:002013-08-17T15:14:20.127-04:00Trademark Snap Shot Publication & Issue Review...Trademark Snap Shot Publication & Issue Review Stylesheet <br />(Table presents the data on Publication & Issue Review Complete)<br /><br />OVERVIEW<br /><br />SERIAL NUMBER 85681509 FILING DATE 07/19/2012<br />REG NUMBER 0000000 REG DATE N/A<br />REGISTER PRINCIPAL MARK TYPE SERVICE MARK<br />INTL REG # N/A INTL REG DATE N/A<br />TM ATTORNEY FALK, ERIN M<br />L.O. ASSIGNED 101<br /><br />PUB INFORMATION<br /><br />RUN DATE 05/02/2013<br />PUB DATE 06/04/2013<br />STATUS 681-PUBLICATION/ISSUE REVIEW COMPLETE<br />STATUS DATE 05/01/2013<br />LITERAL MARK ELEMENT MOBCANDY<br /><br />DATE ABANDONED N/A DATE CANCELLED N/A<br />SECTION 2F NO SECTION 2F IN PART NO<br />SECTION 8 NO SECTION 8 IN PART NO<br />SECTION 15 NO REPUB 12C N/A<br />RENEWAL FILED NO RENEWAL DATE N/A<br />DATE AMEND REG N/A <br /><br /><br />FILING BASIS<br /><br />FILED BASIS CURRENT BASIS AMENDED BASIS<br />1 (a) NO 1 (a) NO 1 (a) NO<br />1 (b) YES 1 (b) YES 1 (b) NO<br />44D NO 44D NO 44D NO<br />44E NO 44E NO 44E NO<br />66A NO 66A NO <br /><br />NO BASIS NO NO BASIS NO <br /><br /><br />MARK DATA<br /><br />STANDARD CHARACTER MARK YES<br />LITERAL MARK ELEMENT MOBCANDY<br />MARK DRAWING CODE 4-STANDARD CHARACTER MARK<br />COLOR DRAWING FLAG NO<br /><br />CURRENT OWNER INFORMATION<br /><br />PARTY TYPE 10-ORIGINAL APPLICANT<br />NAME WASSERMAN, HEATH NORMAN<br />ADDRESS 711 CREEKSIDE CIRCLE<br />GURNEE, IL 60031<br />ENTITY 01-INDIVIDUAL<br />CITIZENSHIP United States of America<br />DBA/AKA DBA MOBCANDY<br /><br />GOODS AND SERVICES<br /><br />INTERNATIONAL CLASS 035<br /> DESCRIPTION TEXT Administration of a discount program for enabling participants to obtain discounts on goods and services through use of a discount membership card; Advertising, marketing, and promoting the goods and services of others via promotion exhibits, video products, Internet, excluding jewelry; Arranging and conducting auctions in the field of promotional events, excluding jewelry; Computerized on-line retail store services in the field of video products, clothing, health and beauty products, all excluding jewelry; Electronic catalog services featuring retail products featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, clothing, video products, excluding jewelry; On-line retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others, exclusive of jewelry<br /><br />GOODS AND SERVICES CLASSIFICATION<br /><br />INTERNATIONAL CLASS 035 FIRST USE DATE NONE FIRST USE IN COMMERCE DATE NONE CLASS STATUS 6-ACTIVE<br /><br />MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION/STATEMENTS<br /><br />CHANGE IN REGISTRATION NO<br />PSEUDO MARK MOB CANDY<br /><br />PROSECUTION HISTORY<br /><br />DATE ENT CD ENT TYPE DESCRIPTION ENT NUM<br />05/01/2013 PREV O LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED 014<br />04/22/2013 CNSA P APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER 013<br />04/19/2013 XAEC I EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED 012<br />04/18/2013 ALIE A ASSIGNED TO LIE 011<br />04/18/2013 GNEN O NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED 010<br />04/18/2013 GNEA O EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED 009<br />04/18/2013 CNEA R EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN 008<br />11/14/2012 GNRN O NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED 007<br />11/14/2012 GNRT F NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED 006<br />11/14/2012 CNRT R NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN 005<br />11/14/2012 DOCK D ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER 004<br />07/27/2012 MPMK O NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED 003<br />07/26/2012 NWOS I NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM 002<br />07/23/2012 NWAP I NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM 001<br /><br />CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION<br /><br />ATTORNEY ATTORNEY MICHAEL CHERNIN<br />CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS ATTORNEY MICHAEL CHERNIN<br />735 N WATER ST<br />MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4100<br />DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE NONEAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-11087001307143146172013-07-03T11:18:37.775-04:002013-07-03T11:18:37.775-04:00Are the shoes for sale yet,, wouldn't mind che...Are the shoes for sale yet,, wouldn't mind checking them out,see what they like, :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14088736165802689074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-13747103993096852042013-04-01T18:56:10.832-04:002013-04-01T18:56:10.832-04:00Renne you have the know how to make it let ur hate...Renne you have the know how to make it let ur haters be ur motavatores i love the stuff u r coming out with and cant wait till i get my pair of mobbcandy'z! Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16493076261036428943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-63470057719630508172013-01-02T20:08:00.348-05:002013-01-02T20:08:00.348-05:00Wow - I am surprised about which covers sold the m...Wow - I am surprised about which covers sold the most... I am also glad you commented here, especially on the TMZ issue; I am going to call your comment out in a post, Chris... Thanks!Ed Scarpohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02178654099167979284noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-13853809211018418982013-01-02T19:37:03.382-05:002013-01-02T19:37:03.382-05:00My blog clearly stated that it was a scumbag move ...My blog clearly stated that it was a scumbag move to claim the brand idea was hers. I don't know why my father in law didn't trademark, and I don't know why he hasn't done anything legal yet. That's his business. <br /><br />Renee was real cool with me, and I promoted the shit out of her cover and even burned a few bridges over choosing her cover over some others. I spent my own money to send fans free mags that she autographed, and I was a huge part in pushing us on the mob wives show episodes. <br /><br />My dad does hard work to publish the magazine, and I honestly feel her dramatic antics could have drew lots of traffic to the magazine if she really wanted it to. She obviously didnt. She wanted to pretend like it was her own idea, and move forward with mob candy branded products. We were discussing lots of moves and proposing tons of ideas to work together with her sister Jenn. She was shooting them down and returning emails requesting ownership of the projects that were unrealistic. At no point did they mention that Renee would be doing her own line of mob candy stuff. Again, not that they were obligated, just that it was a huge slap in the face from someone who was supposedly so appreciative of finally getting on the cover of the magazine she told me she saw such a long time ago. I made that happen. Not my father. I did. Because my dad was telling me I was an asshole the entire time. <br /><br />With all that TV coverage, and mob wives exposure on Renee, they sold nowhere near the sopranos star frank Vincent did. The cover with Tony Napoli sold almost 4 times the amount. Why is that? My father was right. I was the asshole for giving her that cover. Love deserved it 10 times over with her looks, but I was too busy promoting the mob wives and had little time to schedule book signings and anything more then what I had on my plate with mob wives. It was a lot of work, too much for me to handle alone. And I will make it up for her this season of mob wives. I'll be promoting the shit out of Love Majewski. She's gonna be great on that show because she has a fun personality. <br /><br />Renee's friend took pics that day of the photoshoot. Maybe he sent them to TMZ. We had to ask him to stop flashing. If I wanted a story for tmz, trust me that day we had one. I'm just not a dirtbag like that. I considered Renee a friend/pal. I never sent images to tmz. As for my dads debts, they are none of my business. I don't know any details on that stuff. I know I saw him pay many contractors and artists and printers and Distributers with my own eyes. I know he was a hard worker, keep a business afloat when it prolly could have went under if he didnt love it so much. <br /><br />Don't be surprised if you see a mob candy reality show someday soon. You can't imagine the craziness it takes to build the magazine, and publish it step by step, have the meetings, parties, and encounters. All within a family tree of nana, mom, dad, brothers, wife, and grand kids of a Brooklyn knock around family of tough guys ( not wise guys. Only frank was a wise guy and his mom and dad). Me, I'm just a basic tough broooklynite who can't stand the mob lifestyle, and I talk about that in my blogs. I'm no wanna be. <br /><br />We didnt deserve to be fucked like that. Renee should reach out, apologize, and start cross promoting our projects, and giving us due for what is ours and sharing the wealth. We shouldn't have to sue her. Just do the fucking right thing. happy new year everyone. Check out my blog. Http://www.mafialifeblog.com Mafialife Chrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12014723114322379123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-37772227570043605342012-11-09T21:11:26.271-05:002012-11-09T21:11:26.271-05:00The photographer also would have access to the pix...The photographer also would have access to the pix -- do we know for certain how TMZ got the photos?Ed Scarpohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02178654099167979284noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-31932294286251884712012-11-09T21:06:28.316-05:002012-11-09T21:06:28.316-05:00I like Love BTW -- I don't believe she posted ...I like Love BTW -- I don't believe she posted a comment that I deleted -- I deleted that 10,000 word spiel which I believe was filled with untruths. I didn't name the person on the fourth cover either -- Tony Nap. This story isn't about Love and I didn't think she'd want to be in it. But Love if you posted a comment and i deleted it i apologize -- please repost it. And yes Love's cover was my personal favorite....Ed Scarpohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02178654099167979284noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2408697780311463036.post-75953720066886122162012-11-07T12:21:45.609-05:002012-11-07T12:21:45.609-05:00Who is giving Ed Scarpo shit? He can write what h...Who is giving Ed Scarpo shit? He can write what he wishes. I certainly did not write he could not. I read his site on occasion. I decided to share my opinion. I am not Protestant. Ed has a decent site. Though is he not always accurate, neither am I. Renee was shooting a cover for Mob Candy magazine. During some of the shots her vagina was exposed. It was not Renee's intent for her vagina to be photographed. It just happened as it does during photo shoots often. Of course Mob Candy owner Frank weren't going to put those in his magazine. They were bad shots. However, the photos were given to TMZ.<br /><br />Not to long ago, Ed Scarpo got mixed up with an individual who was clearly a fraud. I chose to share with Mr. Scarpo my opinion. It was not an attack nor was I trying to disrespect him in anyway. He has a comment box. I decided to comment. Who am I? I am American too. A person who read Mr. Scarpo defending the fraud claiming another person was obviously jealous of her. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com